Trust Guidance

Private investigator code of ethics in Indonesia

Code of ethics for private investigator services in Indonesia, including lawful purpose, confidentiality, proportional methods, and clear reporting standards.

Private investigator code of ethics in Indonesia

A private investigation service must be built on clear boundaries. The code of ethics helps clients understand what can be done, what must be refused, and how findings should be reported responsibly.

Lawful purpose

Every case must have a legitimate verification purpose. The work is not intended for harassment, revenge, intimidation, or public exposure.

Confidential handling

Client identity, chronology, documents, and findings are handled only within the agreed case scope and are not used for public content.

Proportional methods

The method must match the decision being made. Not every concern requires field observation; some should begin with document or open-source verification.

No illegal access

Hacking, illegal wiretapping, spyware, unauthorized account access, and coercive methods are rejected regardless of the requested outcome.

Clear reporting

Reports should separate confirmed facts, indicators, assumptions, and limitations so clients understand what is known and what remains uncertain.

Escalation boundaries

If a case becomes criminal, dangerous, or legally complex, the client should involve lawyers, auditors, or authorities as appropriate.

Additional standards to understand

Ethics toward the subject

The subject still has privacy and safety rights. Investigation should not use threats, coercion, excessive manipulation, or public exposure of private information.

Ethics toward the client

Clients deserve honest explanation of scope, risk, legal boundaries, estimate, and possible limitations. Client suspicion should not be forced into a conclusion.

Ethics in reporting

Reports should explain context and confidence level. Information that is not yet strong enough should be marked as an indicator, not final fact.

Need a case review with clear boundaries?

Share a short summary first; sensitive details can be controlled after scope is clear.